Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 29.06.2025 02:24

“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Thank you.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Scientists Discover Startling Trick to Defeat Insomnia - futurism.com
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Apple keeps pulling its own ads - The Verge
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Why are Trump supporters so incredibly stupid?
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
SEC clears Trump Media filing, opening door to multi-billion-dollar Bitcoin buy - The Block
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Russia can stop this any time.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Tesla Stock Is Falling on a Downgrade. The Musk-Trump Feud Isn’t Helping. - Barron's
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Rabid fox bites person in Raleigh - WRAL.com
What’s next?
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?